Comparison of effects of homeopathic medicines prepared in glass and plastic vials in macrophage activity in vitro

Authors

  • Leoni Villano Bonamin Universidade Paulista -UNIP, São Paulo
  • Luciana Costa Dalboni UNIP
  • Fabiana Rodrigues Santana UNIP
  • Thayná Neves Cardoso UNIP
  • Fabiana Toshie Konno UNIP
  • Silvia Waisse Priven PUC-SP
  • Amarylis Toledo Cesar Farmacia HN Cristiano

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51910/ijhdr.v15i4.837

Keywords:

high dilution, arsenicum album, silica, macrophages

Abstract

Background: According to the “silica hypothesis†to explain the action of homeopathic medicines, complex nanoparticles involving the silica extracted from the walls of the glass vial during succussions would be needed to act on target cells. Aims: We aimed to know if suspended particles of silica found in Arsenicum album (AA) could be associated to its biological effects in vitro. Methodology: RAW 264.7 macrophages were co-cultured with yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) to promote phagocytosis. During this process, the cells were exposed to AA in different homeopathic dilutions (30K, 6cH and 200cH) prepared in both, glass or silica-fee plastic vials. All dilutions were prepared from the same 3cH matrix. Since parallel experiments showed random stimulating and inhibiting effects of homeopathic lactose, untreated cells and water were used as controls. The macrophage activity was measured by digital histometry (Metamorph®), reflecting the cell spreading and phagocytosis. A complementary analysis using the acridine orange stain in real time fluorescence microscopy was also performed to evaluate the organization of phago-lysosomes inside the cells. All experiments were performed in triplicate. Microparticles present in the medicines were identified in an EDS (energy dispersive x-ray detector) system (JEOL JMS 6510), according to their chemical elements composition. The morphology of particles was not considered for analysis, since it was considered irrelevant. Results: Experiment one: AA 30K and pure water, when prepared in plastic vials, were able to increase macrophage activity (p≤0.05), but the same result was not seen in cells treated with AA 30K or pure water stocked in glass. Experiment two: AA 200cH prepared in plastic vials also lead to significant increase of macrophage spreading (p≤0.05) in relation to the controls, but no effect was seen in the samples prepared in glass vials. Experiment three: No difference was observed in AA 6cH treated cells in relation to the controls. The morphology of the cells under fluorescence microscopy exhibited increase in lysosome activity in AA 200cH prepared in both plastic and glass vials, in relation to the untreated control. The EDS analysis has shown that only medicines prepared in glass vials contained suspended silica particles. Conclusions: Taken the data together, the unspecific effects on macrophage spreading after treatment with homeopathic AA 30K, 200cH and water prepared in plastic vials, added to the absence of silica particles in these preparations and the increase of lysosomal activity only seen in AA 200cH, independently of the vial nature, corroborate that silica might not be a mandatory condition to justify the biological effects of homeopathic medicines. Additionally, the existence of putative contaminants released from plastic vials during the medicine manipulation deserves further studies. Acknowledgements: CAPES, UNIP, ABFH

Author Biography

Leoni Villano Bonamin, Universidade Paulista -UNIP, São Paulo

Professor of General Pathology for Veterinary Medicine, University PAULISTA

Professor of MSc and PhD programs in Immunopathology, University PAULISTA

President of the GIRI - 2002 - 2008

Vice-President of the GIRI - 2008 - 2011

Downloads

Published

2021-08-18

How to Cite

Bonamin, L. V., Dalboni, L. C., Santana, F. R., Cardoso, T. N., Konno, F. T., Priven, S. W., & Cesar, A. T. (2021). Comparison of effects of homeopathic medicines prepared in glass and plastic vials in macrophage activity in vitro. International Journal of High Dilution Research - ISSN 1982-6206, 15(4), 9–9. https://doi.org/10.51910/ijhdr.v15i4.837

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>